Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Mixed Messages and Ironic Arrogance
As our city "leaders" keep kicking the can of immigration
screening down the street, we are seeing some very interesting
approaches taken to address this issue.
For example, on one hand, our police chief, John Hensley, is scheduling outreach meetings for himself and his staff, apparently in an attempt to provide accurate information to the residents of this city to turn down the flames of discontent. At the same time, our young jailer/mayor is heading in the other direction. Tonight he's scheduled to speak before the California Coalition for Immigration Reform and will likely pour gasoline on those same flames as he echoes his vacuous mantra, dismayed at how anyone could disagree with him, since he's only "trying to make our city safer". Of course, he will be preaching to the choir tonight, since representatives from the CCIR practically grovel at his feet these days and will likely begin building a shrine to him in the near future.
Then, a local rabble-rouser who defines himself as an activist - kind of like a wolf in sheep's clothing - found himself the subject of controversy once again last Sunday, as the venerable Spanish language newspaper, La Opinion, did a cover story on him and his activities in this town. La Opinion, second only to the Los Angeles Times in circulation in Southern California, raised questions about the propriety of this man's participation on an official city committee, and quoted extensively from some of his repugnant internet essays - at least, those that could be quoted in a family newspaper.
This man, who bears an amazing resemblance to my theoretical character, Your Neighbor, posted an ironically arrogant bit of prose in a recent entry on his web log. Apparently to bolster his criticism of people who stepped forward to speak out against the moves of our city council recently - people he refers to as "intolerant haters and bigots" - this man provided a couple quotes to support his position, one of which was from Frederick Douglass. The irony here is that Douglass was an escaped slave, born of mixed heritage - something this "activist" has railed against for years in his internet essays. He's bemoaned the dilution of the white race through what he has repeatedly referred to as "blending" - the intermarriage of whites with those of what he apparently perceives to be less-than-pure heritage. I found myself chuckling as I pondered the possible reaction to the Douglass quote by his loyal readers on the white supremacist web sites for which he writes - like the National Vanguard and the New Nation News. Will they think, because he chose to quote Douglass, that their "fair haired boy" has begun to go soft? Will they confiscate his white sheet? Will he be forced to return his "Prussian Blue" CDs? He's demonstrated for us once again that even people with prodigious intellects can do stupid things every once in awhile. At least, that's the way it looks to us "lonely old men" who sit in our "rented rooms" in our "dirty Fruit-of-the-Looms" with our "tuna-can antennae" taped to our ears. Those quotes are his, from a previous entry in his "little newsletter". You have to give him credit - no one ever said he wasn't clever. Misguided, articulate, racist and clever - a nasty, dangerous combination.
Another irony is the fact that those people he criticizes were not the ones who showed up at recent City Council meetings with bullhorns to "out-shout" their opponents - his side was. Those he criticized were not the ones who screamed the words to "God Bless America" to drown out the opposition in the council chambers - his side was. The thesis of his blog posting was, theoretically, free speech, and the need to "use it" or "lose it", and yet he rants and raves about those he criticized for doing precisely that. The depth of his hypocracy is almost unfathomable!
Based on recent blog entries, we're already getting a feel for his position regarding potential candidates for city council next fall. It will be interesting to see who he supports as we move toward the elections. Those expecting his support better be ready to be toe his line without question, because he's already shown us his wrath for those who don't. He's already stated flat out that his failure to support Chris Steel for re-election cost Steel his seat. If that's true, I guess we should thank him for that bit of civic service. He's already threatened his two anointed ones, Mayor Mansoor and Mayor Pro Tem Bever, because they stepped out of line recently. Candidates who embrace him need to be aware that you can't snuggle up to a skunk without coming away covered in stink, too. You are, indeed, known by the company you keep.
It certainly does look like it's going to be a very interesting year.
4:56 pm pst
For example, on one hand, our police chief, John Hensley, is scheduling outreach meetings for himself and his staff, apparently in an attempt to provide accurate information to the residents of this city to turn down the flames of discontent. At the same time, our young jailer/mayor is heading in the other direction. Tonight he's scheduled to speak before the California Coalition for Immigration Reform and will likely pour gasoline on those same flames as he echoes his vacuous mantra, dismayed at how anyone could disagree with him, since he's only "trying to make our city safer". Of course, he will be preaching to the choir tonight, since representatives from the CCIR practically grovel at his feet these days and will likely begin building a shrine to him in the near future.
Then, a local rabble-rouser who defines himself as an activist - kind of like a wolf in sheep's clothing - found himself the subject of controversy once again last Sunday, as the venerable Spanish language newspaper, La Opinion, did a cover story on him and his activities in this town. La Opinion, second only to the Los Angeles Times in circulation in Southern California, raised questions about the propriety of this man's participation on an official city committee, and quoted extensively from some of his repugnant internet essays - at least, those that could be quoted in a family newspaper.
This man, who bears an amazing resemblance to my theoretical character, Your Neighbor, posted an ironically arrogant bit of prose in a recent entry on his web log. Apparently to bolster his criticism of people who stepped forward to speak out against the moves of our city council recently - people he refers to as "intolerant haters and bigots" - this man provided a couple quotes to support his position, one of which was from Frederick Douglass. The irony here is that Douglass was an escaped slave, born of mixed heritage - something this "activist" has railed against for years in his internet essays. He's bemoaned the dilution of the white race through what he has repeatedly referred to as "blending" - the intermarriage of whites with those of what he apparently perceives to be less-than-pure heritage. I found myself chuckling as I pondered the possible reaction to the Douglass quote by his loyal readers on the white supremacist web sites for which he writes - like the National Vanguard and the New Nation News. Will they think, because he chose to quote Douglass, that their "fair haired boy" has begun to go soft? Will they confiscate his white sheet? Will he be forced to return his "Prussian Blue" CDs? He's demonstrated for us once again that even people with prodigious intellects can do stupid things every once in awhile. At least, that's the way it looks to us "lonely old men" who sit in our "rented rooms" in our "dirty Fruit-of-the-Looms" with our "tuna-can antennae" taped to our ears. Those quotes are his, from a previous entry in his "little newsletter". You have to give him credit - no one ever said he wasn't clever. Misguided, articulate, racist and clever - a nasty, dangerous combination.
Another irony is the fact that those people he criticizes were not the ones who showed up at recent City Council meetings with bullhorns to "out-shout" their opponents - his side was. Those he criticized were not the ones who screamed the words to "God Bless America" to drown out the opposition in the council chambers - his side was. The thesis of his blog posting was, theoretically, free speech, and the need to "use it" or "lose it", and yet he rants and raves about those he criticized for doing precisely that. The depth of his hypocracy is almost unfathomable!
Based on recent blog entries, we're already getting a feel for his position regarding potential candidates for city council next fall. It will be interesting to see who he supports as we move toward the elections. Those expecting his support better be ready to be toe his line without question, because he's already shown us his wrath for those who don't. He's already stated flat out that his failure to support Chris Steel for re-election cost Steel his seat. If that's true, I guess we should thank him for that bit of civic service. He's already threatened his two anointed ones, Mayor Mansoor and Mayor Pro Tem Bever, because they stepped out of line recently. Candidates who embrace him need to be aware that you can't snuggle up to a skunk without coming away covered in stink, too. You are, indeed, known by the company you keep.
It certainly does look like it's going to be a very interesting year.
No comments:
Post a Comment