Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Olive Branch Rejected - Replaced by Foot In Mouth
Olive Branch Rejected - Replaced by Foot In Mouth
The council meeting on October 18th, one which again found
Mayor Pro Tem Gary Monahan absent, held few surprises -
unfortunately.
During the "council member comments" portion of the meeting Councilwoman Katrina Foley took the high road as she attempted to make peace with Mayor Allan Mansoor and Councilman Eric Bever when she apologized - unnecessarily, in my opinion - for whatever part she might have played in the recent tensions on the dais. She suggested the council consider a retreat - a quiet place where they all could "get to know each other", to help them work more effectively in the future. That suggestion was rejected out of hand by Mayor Mansoor, who stated that he didn't think there was tension, and felt the public forum was a satisfactory venue for any discussions they might have. Bever, during his allotted time, took that opportunity to defend his recent allegations against Foley, stubbornly rejecting the city attorney's opinion that no law had been broken. In a bizarre moment, he first denied there had been allegations, then went on to reiterate those very charges!
Later, an impasse was reached when Foley nominated former Mayor Linda Dixon to fill the role of Mayor Pro Tem, the abandonment of which was recently announced by Monahan. There was no second. Then Mansoor nominated his buddy, Bever, for the position - citing his "leadership" on the Westside overlay issue as a good reason for him to be considered. That nomination also received no second, so the issue was put off until Monahan is available to break the tie.
You might recall that Bever put forward the minority view from the report prepared by the Westside Redevelopment Oversight Committee, casting aside the consensus reached by those 40 volunteers after a year of analysis, discussion and negotiation. Instead, he chose to placate a small, vocal cadre of his Westside supporters rather than consider the recommendations of the committee as a whole. Apparently Mansoor and Bever define "leadership" as pandering to a narrowly focused minority view, then jamming it down our throats.
Another example of this "style" was Bever's refusal to nominate two of the three candidates nominated for openings on the Cultural Arts Committee, even though all three met the qualifications. His narrow view was that two of the three were "only" involved in dance, not the "visual arts" that he preferred. He indicated that he didn't want to inject diverse viewpoints in a group that "was just beginning to make progress". I guess that means they were finally coming around to his point of view. Fortunately, the remaining three council members present exercised better judgment and appointed all three candidates in a 3-1 vote - Bever voted no. His reluctance to accept diverse viewpoints is no surprise to me - he's demonstrated this characteristic ever since his election last year.
Bever polished off the evening by, in a last second move reminiscent of USC's win over Notre Dame last weekend, managing to save his streak of meetings in which he utters a bonehead statement. At the very end, when City Manager Allan Roeder announced that he would celebrate his twentieth year as City Manager next week and expressed his gratitude for the chance to serve the city, Bever closed the proceedings by wondering out loud to Mansoor whether this milestone qualified as a "Pink Belly" opportunity! Does he not realize that he doesn't have to necessarily say every single thought that runs through his head? Good grief!
3:33 pm pdt
During the "council member comments" portion of the meeting Councilwoman Katrina Foley took the high road as she attempted to make peace with Mayor Allan Mansoor and Councilman Eric Bever when she apologized - unnecessarily, in my opinion - for whatever part she might have played in the recent tensions on the dais. She suggested the council consider a retreat - a quiet place where they all could "get to know each other", to help them work more effectively in the future. That suggestion was rejected out of hand by Mayor Mansoor, who stated that he didn't think there was tension, and felt the public forum was a satisfactory venue for any discussions they might have. Bever, during his allotted time, took that opportunity to defend his recent allegations against Foley, stubbornly rejecting the city attorney's opinion that no law had been broken. In a bizarre moment, he first denied there had been allegations, then went on to reiterate those very charges!
Later, an impasse was reached when Foley nominated former Mayor Linda Dixon to fill the role of Mayor Pro Tem, the abandonment of which was recently announced by Monahan. There was no second. Then Mansoor nominated his buddy, Bever, for the position - citing his "leadership" on the Westside overlay issue as a good reason for him to be considered. That nomination also received no second, so the issue was put off until Monahan is available to break the tie.
You might recall that Bever put forward the minority view from the report prepared by the Westside Redevelopment Oversight Committee, casting aside the consensus reached by those 40 volunteers after a year of analysis, discussion and negotiation. Instead, he chose to placate a small, vocal cadre of his Westside supporters rather than consider the recommendations of the committee as a whole. Apparently Mansoor and Bever define "leadership" as pandering to a narrowly focused minority view, then jamming it down our throats.
Another example of this "style" was Bever's refusal to nominate two of the three candidates nominated for openings on the Cultural Arts Committee, even though all three met the qualifications. His narrow view was that two of the three were "only" involved in dance, not the "visual arts" that he preferred. He indicated that he didn't want to inject diverse viewpoints in a group that "was just beginning to make progress". I guess that means they were finally coming around to his point of view. Fortunately, the remaining three council members present exercised better judgment and appointed all three candidates in a 3-1 vote - Bever voted no. His reluctance to accept diverse viewpoints is no surprise to me - he's demonstrated this characteristic ever since his election last year.
Bever polished off the evening by, in a last second move reminiscent of USC's win over Notre Dame last weekend, managing to save his streak of meetings in which he utters a bonehead statement. At the very end, when City Manager Allan Roeder announced that he would celebrate his twentieth year as City Manager next week and expressed his gratitude for the chance to serve the city, Bever closed the proceedings by wondering out loud to Mansoor whether this milestone qualified as a "Pink Belly" opportunity! Does he not realize that he doesn't have to necessarily say every single thought that runs through his head? Good grief!
No comments:
Post a Comment