Thursday, March 9, 2006
The Truth About ICE and Welcome Absence
The Truth About ICE and Welcome Absence
Well, that does it! I simply have to find a way to sell
tickets to our City Council meetings! They have drama and
comedy. They have mystery and intrigue. All they need are a
couple big dance numbers and they'd have it all! They're the
best show in town.
Tuesday night, for example, we saw our own special version of democracy on display.
In an encounter that should have occurred in a study session way back last year, we saw our police chief, John Hensley, grilled by the two women on the City Council, Linda Dixon and Katrina Foley, regarding our young jailer/mayor's plan for cross-designation of certain Costa Mesa police officers for immigration screening. What we learned was very illuminating.
We learned that the chief doesn't support this plan. We learned that the estimated $200,000 cost of training is really only the tip of the iceberg - that the training costs will continue on into perpetuity as officers rotate in and out of assignments where cross-designation is a factor. We learned that we still don't have a clue about the Sheriff's plan - which we are supposed to mirror in Costa Mesa. We learned that it's unlikely that the plan will actually do what our mayor says is his goal - to remove dangerous felons from our streets. We learned that it might take an officer off the streets for as long as half a shift for each individual he apprehends and "processes" under the ICE guidelines. We learned that our streets will not necessarily be safer through the implementation of the mayor's plan. We learned that all the turmoil and dissension in our city over the past several months might never have happened if the mayor had done his job properly and not gone off half-cocked.
We also learned that our young jailer/mayor, as one friend pointed out to me, has used his bully pulpit to become a bully in the pulpit. Last night we saw him sink to his lowest point, decorum-wise, as he made a motion to receive and file the chief's report while Foley was in the middle of a comment of the subject. She sharply, and appropriately, rebuffed his attempt to stifle her comments and continued until she had said her piece. This, Mansoor's latest and most overt attempt at censorship, is a perfect example of how little he regards any opinion except his own. It was precisely this kind of act that has our city and our mayor saddled with an ACLU lawsuit.
During the public comments segment of the meeting we learned that more than 1,000 people have signed letters to the council, presented in person at this meeting and an earlier one, expressing their disagreement with the mayor's plan. Obviously, these are not the people the mayor means when he tells us that he proposed this plan because he "heard from members of the public" about it.
We also learned that, regardless the side of the issue they represented, the most reasoned, calm views expressed by members of the public from the speaker's podium typically were made by Costa Mesa residents. The belligerent, disrespectful, frothing rants were, again, delivered by out-of-town agitators, apparently looking for face time on the 11 o'clock news.
It is becoming painfully obvious that our young jailer/mayor is feeling the stress of this situation he's created. Clearly, he's not up to the task and our city is suffering because of his inadequacy. When you combine Mansoor's heavy-handed, inept style and his buddy, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Bever's penchant for blurting out anything that comes into his head - a true loose cannon - one cannot but feel anguish for the state of leadership in our city today.
***
An interesting sidebar last night was the absence of an activist who closely resembles my theoretical character, Your Neighbor. For many years he has been a fixture at almost every public forum conducted in this city, offering his "wisdom" and "guidance" to almost any issue. In fact, ever since he resigned from the 3R committee early last month he has, for the most part, become "the invisible man". That's not all bad, believe me. Maybe he's decided to try that old "tuna-can-taped-to-the-ears" technique that he created in a fictional character not too long ago to stay in tune with city issues. If so, I've got some empties around here someplace I can send over to him.
Perhaps he's been spending his time fending off interview requests from the hoards of media folks that have descended on our community over the past three months. Based on what I read in his current blog posting and his most recent internet essay, it sounds like he's been approached for interviews by at least one reporter. It's not clear whether he charged her for his time, but I wouldn't be surprised, since he frequently has demanded compensation for his commentaries in local publications. Talk about an ego! Regardless the reason for his absence, I'm glad he decided to slither back under that rock. We all can use a little rest.
1:33 am pst
Tuesday night, for example, we saw our own special version of democracy on display.
In an encounter that should have occurred in a study session way back last year, we saw our police chief, John Hensley, grilled by the two women on the City Council, Linda Dixon and Katrina Foley, regarding our young jailer/mayor's plan for cross-designation of certain Costa Mesa police officers for immigration screening. What we learned was very illuminating.
We learned that the chief doesn't support this plan. We learned that the estimated $200,000 cost of training is really only the tip of the iceberg - that the training costs will continue on into perpetuity as officers rotate in and out of assignments where cross-designation is a factor. We learned that we still don't have a clue about the Sheriff's plan - which we are supposed to mirror in Costa Mesa. We learned that it's unlikely that the plan will actually do what our mayor says is his goal - to remove dangerous felons from our streets. We learned that it might take an officer off the streets for as long as half a shift for each individual he apprehends and "processes" under the ICE guidelines. We learned that our streets will not necessarily be safer through the implementation of the mayor's plan. We learned that all the turmoil and dissension in our city over the past several months might never have happened if the mayor had done his job properly and not gone off half-cocked.
We also learned that our young jailer/mayor, as one friend pointed out to me, has used his bully pulpit to become a bully in the pulpit. Last night we saw him sink to his lowest point, decorum-wise, as he made a motion to receive and file the chief's report while Foley was in the middle of a comment of the subject. She sharply, and appropriately, rebuffed his attempt to stifle her comments and continued until she had said her piece. This, Mansoor's latest and most overt attempt at censorship, is a perfect example of how little he regards any opinion except his own. It was precisely this kind of act that has our city and our mayor saddled with an ACLU lawsuit.
During the public comments segment of the meeting we learned that more than 1,000 people have signed letters to the council, presented in person at this meeting and an earlier one, expressing their disagreement with the mayor's plan. Obviously, these are not the people the mayor means when he tells us that he proposed this plan because he "heard from members of the public" about it.
We also learned that, regardless the side of the issue they represented, the most reasoned, calm views expressed by members of the public from the speaker's podium typically were made by Costa Mesa residents. The belligerent, disrespectful, frothing rants were, again, delivered by out-of-town agitators, apparently looking for face time on the 11 o'clock news.
It is becoming painfully obvious that our young jailer/mayor is feeling the stress of this situation he's created. Clearly, he's not up to the task and our city is suffering because of his inadequacy. When you combine Mansoor's heavy-handed, inept style and his buddy, Mayor Pro Tem Eric Bever's penchant for blurting out anything that comes into his head - a true loose cannon - one cannot but feel anguish for the state of leadership in our city today.
***
An interesting sidebar last night was the absence of an activist who closely resembles my theoretical character, Your Neighbor. For many years he has been a fixture at almost every public forum conducted in this city, offering his "wisdom" and "guidance" to almost any issue. In fact, ever since he resigned from the 3R committee early last month he has, for the most part, become "the invisible man". That's not all bad, believe me. Maybe he's decided to try that old "tuna-can-taped-to-the-ears" technique that he created in a fictional character not too long ago to stay in tune with city issues. If so, I've got some empties around here someplace I can send over to him.
Perhaps he's been spending his time fending off interview requests from the hoards of media folks that have descended on our community over the past three months. Based on what I read in his current blog posting and his most recent internet essay, it sounds like he's been approached for interviews by at least one reporter. It's not clear whether he charged her for his time, but I wouldn't be surprised, since he frequently has demanded compensation for his commentaries in local publications. Talk about an ego! Regardless the reason for his absence, I'm glad he decided to slither back under that rock. We all can use a little rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment